King Charles III and the Royal way

Credit: cwcaddict.com

While browsing CWC Addict blog (wonderful site by the way), I happened to stumble upon a 1981 photo showing King Charles III wearing a Hamilton 6BB chronograph. What a remarkable photo. The presumption that he got it issued while following a long-standing tradition of the Royal Family serving the Armed Forces made it all the more remarkable.

But this post is not about what he’s wearing. It’s the way he wears it.

Do you see the D ring on his NATO strap?  Notice anything?  Normally, the signature D ring should be positioned at 6 o’clock lug instead of 12 as pictured. My initial thought was, “he must be wearing the strap in reverse.” That is, inserting the strap from the 6 o’clock lug, which would leave the buckle side at 6 with the D-ring threaded at 12. (Some people wear it that way, especially with NATOs, to make the watch sit evenly on the wrist). The drawback to this approach is that excess tail of the strap faces you. Most people would hate that, me included. King Charles’ NATO was different, however, because the excess tail was facing “away” from the wearer, which happens when a strap is worn normally. Hmmm…

The same blog referenced another photo of King Charles III wearing the same watch taken in 2008.

(Photo Credit: Lee Fennema)

Assuming the strap is worn the same way as before, notice how the holes appear right next to the 6 o’clock lug with the buckle just a few holes away. The only logical explanation seemed he wore the NATO without threading it beyond the D-ring. Like this, for example:

Phoenix NATO strapped to my Seiko 7548 diver.

My hypothesis was confirmed when I found another photo of King Charles III wearing the same configuration.  It was taken at Wattisham Flying Station, Suffolk, Britain on 9 May 2013:

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Shutterstock (2334068a) Prince Charles, Colonel in Chief of the Army Air Corps salutes as he presents operational service medals to 662 Squadron Army Air Corps along with reservists, who have returned from Afghanistan Prince Charles at Wattisham Flying Station, Suffolk, Britain – 09 May 2013

Perhaps King Charles III is unaware of how a NATO strap works or simply too busy to give it serious thought.  This is not a criticism. Rather, I would like to humbly propose that this is the “Royal” way of wearing a NATO.

So I wore my NATO the Royal way for a few days and found it surprisingly comfortable. Probably had to do with the buckle sitting away from the center of the wrist.

The downside of wearing it this way was that the watch almost slipped away from the strap when I was putting the watch on my wrist. It wouldn’t have happened had the strap been properly worn, for a D-ring at 6 o’clock would catch the watch.

But it’s comfortable and feels royal. And that’s all that matters!

My grail Vostok

I bought an old Vostok. But not just any Vostok. I bought my grail Vostok, a Soviet-era manual wind dive watch with a rare civilian dial showing a map of Antarctica and bright red Cyrillic letters stating that it is. But it wasn’t. More about that later. Anyway, this “Vostok Antarctic” wasn’t a grail initially, although stories of expeditions to exotic locations have fascinated me since childhood. And I love tough, inexpensive watches. With its Antarctic flair, it was certainly at the crossroads of my interests in expeditions and tough watches.

The first time I became aware of the existence of Vostok Antarctic was through a chance encounter with a website while googling for parts for another Vostok watch I own. The site displayed three not-so-great photos of Vostok Antarctic but one did show the dial clearly. It was a civilian dial, a rare feature for Vostok which is better known for military-themed dials. I imagined the watch being issued to scientists stationed in Antarctica as part of their standard equipment or handed out as a memento to those who had been there. But the site was an archive page, not a web store selling watches. After admiring the photo for a few minutes, I soon forgot about it.

The second time I came across Vostok Antarctic was on ebay from a Russian seller specializing in vintage Vostoks earlier this year. Fortunately, it was available for purchase. But there were two issues. First, the asking price was quite high for a Vostok. The seller definitely knew it was a rare watch. The other issue was that the seller would not ship to Korea. After contemplating for a few days, I reached out to the seller and asked about the possibility of shipping it to Korea. The seller responded that shipping could be accommodated. Yes!

Still, it was not possible to bid on the watch because the item “does not ship to Korea.” Finally, after the seller updated the shipping details, I was able to bid. I did and won the watch. Yay! But the joy was to be short-lived. You see, during this back and forth about shipping, Russia invaded Ukraine and sanctions kicked in. Neither ebay nor paypal would process my payment to the seller. In the end, the ebay transaction got cancelled. I was devastated. It soon became apparent through news reports that this was a minor inconvenience compared to what the people in Ukraine were suffering. I decided to forget about the whole deal and moved on. And through this ordeal, Vostok Antarctic had quietly transformed into a grail watch status within me. I knew because I found myself combing ebay for old Vostok watches almost every day. There were hundreds of them and none carried the particular dial showing the map of Antarctica.

A few weeks later, another Vostok Antarctic appeared! Not on ebay, but on etsy. This time, the price was reasonable and the seller was based in Ukraine, meaning there were no sanctions to worry about or payment issues. Which begs the other question, whether shipping would be possible out of a war zone. I cautiously inquired about this and received a positive reply from the seller assuring me that the Ukrainian post office was open for business. So the watch was added to my cart and payment went through smoothly. The next day, the seller messaged me saying that he had shipped the watch at a local post office and had included a small gift in the package, an original Vostok box. Wow! He also gave me a tracking number. I tracked that number. Every day. For five weeks!

In the first week, my package was transferred to a sorting facility in Kyiv and marked “ready for dispatch” the following day. And that was it. There were no further updates for the next four weeks. I was calm though. If worse comes to worst and the package gets lost in transit, I would take comfort in the fact that a small token of contribution was made to a fellow watch collector in Ukraine. Nevertheless, the wait was painful. Then, in the fifth week, the package arrived at my house unannounced! Turns out, it was addressed to North Korea. And, somehow by a miracle, it was routed to South Korea. I messaged the Ukrainian seller about this error on the shipping label. He was relieved to hear that the package had arrived safely and went on to explain that the Ukrainian postal service was also known to confuse Austria with Australia. No big deal.

The watch was beautiful, just as I had imagined, slightly better. Ran without a flaw. Couldn’t be happier. The plastic box that came with it looked as if it was as old as the watch.

By the way, according to the Ukrainian seller, my Vostok Antarctic was not Antarctic but an “Apatity Development of the Arctic limited edition”. Apatity is a town in the Murmansk Oblast on the Kola Peninsula, north of the Arctic Circle. The map on the dial is that of Murmansk Oblast and the red Cryllic letters read “Apatitstroy”. From googling, it appears “Apatitstroy” either refers to a construction company based in Apatity, or a Soviet hockey team that had represented the arctic town. Can’t believe I had confused Arctic with Antarctic. Guess you can’t blame this one on the Ukrainian postal service.

Despite all that, the watch is still my grail Vostok and I am happy to finally own one.

(What is your grail watch?)

Went to line up at Swatch store in Seoul on the opening day of Omega x Swatch MoonSwatch

Yesterday morning, March 26, 2022, I got up early and took an intercity bus to downtown Seoul where the flagship Swatch store is located. It was drizzling and cold. A good sign. My friend was to join me but I got there earlier than him. We were aiming for the Mission to the Moon and Mercury. The street was deserted when I got there which excited me… until I got closer.

“Oh my god!” were the words I uttered in disbelief.

Even the TV news crew was there.

There were two groups of people: those in line and those watching those in line. Gave up and texted my friend that it wasn’t worth coming. He was actually relieved we didn’t have to spend the morning waiting outside in the miserable weather. Still, I wondered if there was a chance to get inside since the line didn’t seem that long.

It was then I noticed there were two types of line in front of the store. A shorter line (on the right in the photo above), it turned out, was for those with advanced tickets from waiting in line the previous day. The other line (on the left) was for those who had just arrived that morning.

I tried to see where that line ended but soon gave up as it seemed to go forever.

Here are a few screen captures from the evening news. Translations have been added below the photos.

“People lined up from the day before in rain and winds… physically fighting for a watch.”

“I couldn’t choose the color I wanted because my number was towards the end so I just bought whatever remained.”

“Police were dispatched after a fight broke out in front of the store.”

“When I heard tickets were handed out yesterday, my thoughts were, ‘Oh, why am I even here now?'”

My thoughts exactly. And thank goodness I didn’t bother lining up. Hope your luck is better.

Watch strap for hiking

I don’t have much to blog about today so instead I’ll write about a strap I use for hiking.

It’s a NATO strap I picked up during a business trip to London several years ago. Don’t know who made them but it was from a street seller on Portobello market who had bundles of them tied to an elastic band. He was trustworthy as he was recommended by a vintage Rolex dealer named James Dowling, whom I made friends with on an internet watch forum. It was while James was giving me a personal tour of Portobello when I asked where one might find an authentic NATO. The price was very reasonable so I ended up purchasing a dozen of them. These were mostly given away to colleagues & watch friends after the trip. The strap shown above is the only one left today.

NATO straps were not designed for hiking per se but made for British armed forces. Long enough to be worn over a mountain jacket, it feels stiff at first but gradually softens up, like breaking in a new pair of jeans. The only inscription visible is a simple ’18’ on the buckle indicating its width. There are no other marking indicating manufacturer or country of origin. Not even sewing marks. What a strange band, I thought. According to military watch forum, these straps are ultrasonically welded together.

The strap I had worn prior to getting this NATO was a regular two-piece type. NATO’s one-piece strap construction helps secure the watch when one spring bar fails. That gave me a peace of mind. The second layer of the strap was purposefully cut off as it had nothing to do with securing the watch when one spring bar fails. That made the strap even more light weight (I used to be a ultralight backpacking freak). It’s not like I go hiking every weekend, but I did thru-hike the Jirisan mountain couple of times and have fond memories of wearing this strap. The chrome plating has worn off to reveal brass underneath. I have a feeling we will be together for a long time.

The Story of Dadaepo Seiko Turtle


The Dadaepo Seiko Turtle (Source: The War Museum of Korea)

Today, I would like to share a story about a totally trashed Seiko Turtle that belonged to a very special owner.  It’s a run-of-the-mill 6309 Turtle but circumstances surrounding how the watch was obtained from its owner is what makes it truly unique.  It’s a Seiko Turtle that once belonged to a North Korean (Nork) frogman who landed on the shores of Dadaepo.  But first, the story.

Dadaepo is a beach located at southwest corner of the port city of Busan, South Korea.  It is a fairly quiet beach and not as crowded as other beaches scattered around the city.  When the weather is clear, you can catch a beautiful sunset in the evening. 

On the night of December 3, 1983, however, this quiet beach was to make headlines around the world as two armed Nork frogmen emerged from its shores and sneaked into a restroom nearby, their supposed rendezvous point, only to be captured by specially trained South Korean soldiers who had been alerted and were lying in wait in concealed positions. The two frogmen were wounded during a short melee but later recovered and both wisely decided to defect to South Korea.


SP-10 semi-submersible craft (Photo by Ryan)

A number of military hardware recovered from the scene were displayed to the public after the incident.  Most notable was a semi-submersible craft, type SP-10, that had transported the two frogmen but was subsequently sunk by South Korean forces off the coast of Dadaepo. It was later recovered, restored and put on permanent display at The War Museum of Korea in the capital city of Seoul.  Another piece of hardware, a much smaller in size but no less significant, was also displayed there. It was the Dadaepo Seiko Turtle worn by one of the captured frogmen. 

The particular Seiko model is affectionately nicknamed “Turtle” by Seiko watch collectors because its chunky steel case resembles a shell of a turtle. Seiko Turtles are powered by Seiko’s in-house automatic movement, either a hacking 6306 calibre sold for Japanese domestic market with Kanji days or a non-hacking 6309 for the overseas market.  It is not known which type of movement the Dadaepo Seiko Turtle employed. What is known, however, is that it is the only Seiko Turtle that is verified as used in actual covert operation.  If its serial number can be traced back to the original Seiko dealer, it would shed light on who had supplied these hardware to Nork and under what circumstances. 

Unfortunately, the last time I had seen the watch on display was way back in September 2002; it has since been locked away in the museum’s archive, away from public view. Recently, the museum’s digital archive opened up… and lo and behold the Dadaepo Seiko Turtle was there! According to the description, the watch was donated to the museum by Korea Defense Intelligence Command (KDIC) in September 1990 and that it had been confiscated from armed Nork frogmen captured at Dadaepo.

Yesterday, I finally managed to track down and got in touch with an archivist at the museum who was the caretaker of Dadaepo artifacts among others. She told me over the phone that only their digital archive was available for public view and that physical access is granted to those who engage in activities deemed a benefit to the public. The scan of the watch shown at the top of this post is the sole photo available from the digital archive. When I pressed for specifics, she explained that because the museum is a public organization, those writing a paper for an academic journal, for example, would be qualified. “Posting an article on an internet watch forum would not suffice,” she said. 

Well, she had the watch in front of her, so I begged her to at least tell me the inscriptions on the back of the case. She was kind enough to read them out to me and here are the details:

Model number: 6309-7040
Serial number: 733XXX

According to multiple Seiko serial number database on the internet, the Dadaepo Seiko Turtle was manufactured in March 1977. As for the dial, the condition was so bad, she could not decipher anything. I thanked her, got off the phone, then found myself searching for suitable journals that might accept my supposed paper. I soon gave up, though, as I found the entire notion silly. I mean, writing a paper for the sole purpose of gaining access to a totally trashed Seiko, a model that I already own in mint condition?!

Well, the story does not stop here. The two Dadaepo frogmen, after having been interned, gave a press conference on December 14, 1983. Thanks to youtube, you can view it here.  It’s in Korean so I don’t expect you to understand it but towards the end of that video clip, it shows some of the hardware used by the Dadaepo frogmen.  And hidden among various scuba gears, you will see a Seiko… but it wasn’t the Turtle!


Seiko diver shown at Dadaepo press conference on December 14, 1983 (Source: KTV)

It was a Seiko 7548 150m quartz diver, a model that was introduced in 1979. My guess is, the quartz model, being relatively new at the time, belonged to the junior of the two frogmen while the earlier 6309 Turtle to the senior, an old-salt.  It’s only a guess and I have no proof to back it up. 

You may also notice a piece of thick string attached to the rubber strap that got broken off from the quartz diver.  That’s a neat hack to convert a two-piece strap into a one-piece strap. In the event one of the spring bars fails, your watch would still stay on your wrist, thanks to the string holding the straps together.  Now go back to that scan of Dadaepo Seiko Turtle at the top of this post. There is a small piece of string hanging loose at the buckle.  The museum has other Nork watches in their archive, mostly dress watches and stop watches, but only the Dadaepo Seiko Turtle has that string.


Mid-size Seiko diver displayed at Gangneung Unification Park (Photo by Ryan)

There is also a mid-size Seiko 6458 150m quartz diver displayed over at Gangneung Unification Park located on the east coast of Korea (above photo).  The watch was found on the wrist of a dead Nork frogman who had washed ashore on a nearby beach on the morning of July 12, 1998 (video clip here). That Seiko dive watch also has a string connecting the two strap parts.  I think Nork frogmen are obsessed over this string hack. Why not?  It’s cheap and it works. Perhaps you should give it a try, too, especially if you dig original Seiko rubber dive straps.

The story of Dadaepo Seiko Turtle does not end here. There are still unanswered questions, like… Which of the two frogmen is the rightful owner? Where was the watch sourced based on the serial number? What type of string was preferred and how was it tied? Et cetera. I will let you know as more information is uncovered on this exciting watch.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started